Inactive cells

All Reservoir Simulation aspects

Moderator: Simulation_team

Post Reply
Tejaswy
Junior member
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Inactive cells

Post by Tejaswy »

Hello,
I am doing a simulation where I am supposed to have a a entire block of cell inactive.

The way to make a block of cells inactive is by giving it an NTG of 0 or a Porosity of 0.
I g ave NTG as 0. The problem I think i am having with them now is that they do not shoe up on Floviz.
I mean the graphs are all as I expected but Is there anyway that inactive cells an show up on FLOViz?


Regards
Tejaswy
User avatar
FANARCO
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2068
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:56 pm
Contact:

Post by FANARCO »

Use ACTNUM to define the only active cells.
If you put the porosity or NTG is zero the simulator will understand these cells as a barrier
User avatar
Bilal Amjad
Senior member
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:14 am
Location: اسلامی جمہوریہ پاکستان

Post by Bilal Amjad »

Floviz can show them if you display Initial Property (NTG or PORO)
Bilal Amjad
Reservoir Engineering Consultant
Tejaswy
Junior member
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post by Tejaswy »

FANARCO wrote:Use ACTNUM to define the only active cells.
If you put the porosity or NTG is zero the simulator will understand these cells as a barrier
No if the NTG is zero Eclipse treats them as iinactive.
User avatar
Abdelkader
Junior member
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:33 am
Location: algiers

Post by Abdelkader »

Tejaswy,
instead of using 0 try to use 0.05 for example instead!
and fix the minimum pore volume value for the cells to 500 rbbls for instance (MINPV keyword), Eclipse will shut the cell (make it inactive) as its pore volume would be under the value specified above!
Hope it'll help!
Kader
Abdelkader Aissaoui
Reservoir Engineer
Image
http://dz.linkedin.com/pub/abdelkader-a ... 13/389/4b6
Tejaswy
Junior member
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:37 pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post by Tejaswy »

Yup... Thanks for that
Post Reply